Interpreting Bandwidth Graphs for Network Performance TuningEffective network performance tuning begins with one simple tool: the bandwidth graph. A well-read graph turns raw data into actionable insights — showing where capacity is exhausted, when congestion occurs, and how traffic patterns change over time. This article explains what bandwidth graphs show, how to read them, common patterns and anomalies, and practical tuning actions you can take based on what you see.
What a bandwidth graph is and what it shows
A bandwidth graph is a time-series visualization of the volume of data sent and received on a network interface, link, or service. Typical elements include:
- Time on the X-axis (seconds, minutes, hours, days).
- Bandwidth on the Y-axis (bits/sec or bytes/sec; sometimes Mbps/Gbps).
- Separate lines or stacked areas for inbound and outbound traffic.
- Optional overlays: average, peak, 95th percentile, thresholds, and annotations for events (deployments, outages).
- Sampling interval: the granularity (e.g., 1s, 1m, 5m) affects the visibility of spikes and short-lived bursts.
Key metrics often derived from the graph:
- Average throughput — the normal traffic level over the chosen period.
- Peak throughput — highest observed value; used for capacity planning.
- Baseline — the steady-state traffic level during non-peak periods.
- Burstiness — frequency and amplitude of short spikes above baseline.
- Utilization (%) — measured throughput divided by interface capacity.
How to read basic shapes and patterns
Recognizing shapes on a graph helps map them to real-world causes.
- Flat low line near zero: idle or unused interface.
- Steady high plateau near capacity: sustained load; potential saturation.
- Regular periodic peaks (daily/weekly): predictable scheduled tasks (backups, batch jobs, business hours).
- Short, sharp spikes: bursty applications, periodic analytics, or scanning activity.
- Growing trend upward: gradual increase in usage — signals need for capacity planning.
- Sudden drop to zero: link failure, device reboot, or route change.
- Asymmetric inbound/outbound: client-heavy vs server-heavy traffic patterns, or misconfigured routing/firewall rules.
Use sampling interval deliberately
Short intervals (e.g., 1s–10s)
- Pros: reveal microbursts, quick spikes, and short-lived anomalies.
- Cons: noisy; large datasets; harder to see long-term trends.
Long intervals (e.g., 5m–1h)
- Pros: smooths noise; reveals baseline and long-term patterns; easier for capacity planning.
- Cons: hides microbursts and short saturations that may still cause packet loss.
Best practice: examine multiple intervals. Use long-range views for capacity planning and short-range views to diagnose performance incidents.
Percentiles and why they matter
Percentile metrics (commonly 95th, 99th) summarize traffic while ignoring outlier spikes:
- 95th percentile is often used for billing and capacity decisions because it excludes brief peaks that are not representative.
- Use percentiles to compare normal operating envelopes and to decide whether occasional bursts justify bandwidth upgrades.
Correlating with other signals
Bandwidth graphs alone rarely tell the whole story. Correlate them with:
- Latency/jitter graphs — high utilization often increases latency.
- Packet loss counters — packet loss at high utilization indicates congestion.
- CPU/memory on network devices — overloaded interfaces sometimes mirror device CPU spikes.
- Application logs and user reports — map traffic events to app behaviors.
- Flow records (NetFlow/IPFIX/sFlow) — identify which IPs/ports/protocols drive traffic.
Example correlation insights:
- High outbound traffic with rising latency and packet loss → likely congestion; consider QoS or capacity increase.
- Spikes coinciding with backup window entries → reschedule or throttle backups.
- Constant high traffic from one IP → possible misbehaving host, uncontrolled backup, or exfiltration.
Common causes of problematic graphs and how to tune
- Sustained utilization near 100%
- Symptoms: flat line near capacity; rising latency; packet loss.
- Actions: add capacity (upgrade link), implement QoS to prioritize critical traffic, apply rate limiting for lower-priority flows, offload traffic via CDN or caching.
- Frequent short spikes causing intermittent packet loss
- Symptoms: spikes visible on short-interval graphs; percentiles still moderate.
- Actions: enable buffering appropriately (careful — buffers add latency), apply policing/shaping at edge, tune TCP settings (window scaling), deploy micro-burst mitigation (switch QoS, egress shaping), and investigate root application causing bursts.
- Large asymmetric or unexpected flows
- Symptoms: one-direction bandwidth dominates; unusual protocols/ports in flow records.
- Actions: inspect application behavior, tighten firewall rules, implement ACLs, quarantine or throttle offending hosts, and engage app teams to reduce chatty behavior.
- Regular periodic peaks interfering with business hours
- Symptoms: daily/weekly recurring peaks at predictable times.
- Actions: reschedule heavy jobs, stagger batch windows, use incremental backups, or move heavy workloads off peak hours.
- Rapid drops to zero or intermittent flaps
- Symptoms: sudden drops or intermittent loss of traffic.
- Actions: check physical link, switch ports, interface errors, flaps (CRC/duplex), device logs, and routing changes. Replace cables or interfaces if errors persist.
Practical tuning checklist (quick reference)
- Verify interface capacity and compare to peak and 95th percentile.
- Look at both inbound and outbound directions.
- Check multiple sampling intervals.
- Correlate with latency, packet loss, device CPU, and flow records.
- Identify top talkers and protocols.
- Apply QoS: classify critical flows and limit bulk traffic.
- Rate-limit or shape heavy background jobs.
- Consider horizontal scaling (more links) or vertical upgrades (higher-capacity interfaces).
- Schedule maintenance and backups outside peak windows.
- Monitor after changes and iterate.
Tools and visualizations that help
- Real-time dashboards (Grafana, Datadog, Prometheus + exporters) for flexible panels.
- Flow analysis tools (ntopng, nfdump, Elastic + Packetbeat) to find top talkers.
- Packet capture (tcpdump, Wireshark) for deep-dive on protocol behavior.
- Network performance testing (iPerf, RFC2544-style tests) to validate link behavior under controlled load.
Example interpretation scenarios
- Scenario: 1 Gbps link shows average 300 Mbps, 95th percentile 700 Mbps, occasional 900 Mbps spikes lasting seconds, and users report occasional slow app response.
- Interpretation: bursts cause short-lived congestion; average capacity is fine but microbursts exceed buffer/TCP behavior causing latency.
- Tuning: add egress shaping/policing, enable QoS for latency-sensitive traffic, or raise capacity if bursts increase.
- Scenario: Sudden sustained uptick from 200 Mbps to 850 Mbps over weeks.
- Interpretation: growth trend likely due to new services or user behavior.
- Tuning: plan capacity upgrade, identify sources (flow data), and consider caching/CDN or load distribution.
Measuring success
After tuning, confirm improvements by:
- Reduced latency and packet loss during previous peak windows.
- Lowered 95th percentile or fewer spikes exceeding threshold.
- Application-level metrics (response time, error rates) improved.
- User complaints reduced during previously problematic times.
Use A/B or staged rollouts for configuration changes and monitor closely for regressions.
Conclusion
Bandwidth graphs are a compact, powerful window into network health. Reading their shapes, correlating with other signals, and applying targeted tuning (QoS, shaping, scheduling, or capacity changes) converts visual trends into meaningful performance improvements. Start by examining multiple time scales, identify top talkers, and iterate: small policy changes often deliver large gains in user experience.
Leave a Reply